The Justice Law Partners01
Record review
The order in question, earlier pleadings, connected orders and material documents provide the starting point.
Practice areas
Supreme Court Practice
Areas of work
- Special Leave Petitions
- Constitutional challenges
- Public-interest matters
- Review and curative petitions
- Inter-state and national-importance disputes
Understanding the matter before the next step
Supreme Court proceedings call for a focused account of the legal questions, the orders already passed and the relief sought. The starting point is a careful review of the record rather than a promise about the outcome.
Material for an initial review
Prepare a brief chronology, copies of the relevant judgments and orders, the pleadings relied upon, and details of any pending hearing or deadline. Identify connected proceedings and earlier applications so that the procedural history can be understood together.
Scope and professional checks
The appropriate course depends on the facts, procedural history and applicable requirements. Availability, conflicts, scope of work and arrangements for filing and appearance are addressed before an engagement is accepted. An enquiry does not itself create an advocate-client relationship.
Related reading
Read source-linked case notes or find official court resources. Website material is general information, not advice on a particular case.
Approaching the Supreme Court: what is considered first?
The appropriate remedy depends on the order, procedural history and applicable law. This is a general outline, not a promise that a petition will be accepted, listed urgently or succeed.
02
Remedy and timing
Maintainability, jurisdiction, limitation and any urgent deadline need assessment before deciding the next step.
03
Questions and relief
The proposed grounds and the precise final or interim relief sought should be identified against the record.
04
Preparation
The petition, chronology and supporting papers must be prepared with the applicable filing requirements in mind.
05
Filing and Registry
Filing through the Advocate-on-Record includes attention to Registry requirements and any defects identified.
06
Hearing preparation
The record, grounds and relief inform preparation for the hearing. Any proposed briefing of additional counsel should be discussed as part of the engagement.
When an initial review may be useful
An adverse High Court order, an approaching appeal deadline, a need for interim protection, or consideration of a post-judgment remedy may call for prompt professional assessment. None of these circumstances establishes an entitlement to Supreme Court relief.
Keep the essentials ready
- The judgment or order you wish to question, and earlier connected orders.
- Pleadings and relevant annexures from the proceedings below.
- A concise chronology, dates of the order and receipt, and any forthcoming hearing or deadline.
- Details of connected or earlier proceedings.
Please do not transmit confidential case papers through the initial enquiry form. Complete preliminary conflict and engagement checks and agree an appropriate document-sharing method first.
The Advocate-on-Record role
An Advocate-on-Record is entitled under the Supreme Court Rules to act as well as plead for a party before the Court. See the official Supreme Court Rules and Advocate-on-Record information.
Contact the New Delhi office
Call +91 79825 20184 · Matter enquiries → · Leadership & Team →
Representative Supreme Court matters
Explore selected constitutional and larger-Bench proceedings in which Binay Kumar, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record. The library distinguishes historical decisions, references and connected proceedings.
Which Supreme Court procedure may be relevant?
Special Leave Petition (SLP)
An SLP asks the Court for permission to appeal under Article 136. Permission is discretionary; an adverse High Court order does not itself confer a further appeal as of right.
Civil and criminal appeals
The route may depend on a statutory right, a certificate or leave granted by the Court. Provide the complete order and identify any connected proceedings.
Writ and transfer proceedings
A fundamental-rights claim and a request to transfer proceedings serve different purposes. Jurisdiction and the available alternative remedies need separate assessment.
Review and curative petitions
These are limited post-judgment remedies, not another unrestricted appeal. Curative jurisdiction is exceptional and follows dismissal of review.
Stay and urgent applications
Filing does not itself suspend the order challenged. Explain the immediate risk, the relief required and any application already made below.
Limitation and filing papers
Do not assume one deadline fits every proceeding. Preserve the order date, copy-application details, service record and relevant holidays for calculation by counsel.
Official jurisdiction overview · Official forms · Check Supreme Court case status
Preparing for urgent relief · Reviewed Supreme Court updates
Questions to resolve before instructing an Advocate-on-Record
Can I obtain an initial assessment without travelling to Delhi?
Ask the office whether a remote consultation can be arranged. Send a brief enquiry first, identifying the order, court and urgent date. Document-sharing, identity checks, instructions and any attendance requirements must then be agreed for the particular matter. A remote discussion does not remove a court requirement to attend.
What should the proposed fees cover?
Ask for clarity about record review, drafting, filing, Registry work, appearances, additional applications and any separate counsel briefing. Discuss court fees, copying, translation and other expenses where relevant. Confirm what is included, what is additional and how further work will be authorised; do not assume one quoted amount covers every stage.
How will I know what has happened after filing?
Ask who will communicate with you and how you will receive the filing or diary number, details of defects requiring action, listing information and copies of orders. Keep your own dated record. Use the official Supreme Court website for case status, cause lists and orders, and clarify the next required step with counsel.
What if I already have a lawyer or an AOR?
Disclose the existing engagement and all earlier filings at the outset. Ask what professional and procedural steps are needed before any change of representation. Do not arrange overlapping filings or assume that making a new enquiry transfers responsibility for a deadline.
How should I compare lawyers?
Consider verified professional status, experience relevant to the legal issue, the clarity of the proposed assessment, communication arrangements and a transparent scope of work. No responsible assessment can assure admission, a stay, a particular Bench, an urgent listing or success. A familiar case title alone does not establish the role a lawyer performed.
What if the cost is a concern?
Ask about the proposed scope and likely stages before committing. You can also consult the Court’s official legal-aid information to explore available assistance and current eligibility requirements.
Discuss the next step with the office → · Binay Kumar, Advocate-on-Record: professional profile · Supreme Court updates
General information only. The appropriate remedy, limitation, filing requirements and attendance arrangements require individual assessment. An enquiry does not confirm an engagement or suspend an existing order or deadline.