The Justice Law PartnersNew Delhi · Established 2010
Legal representation in New Delhi and before the Supreme Court
Legal help for civil, criminal, family and property disputes, and Supreme Court matters.
Led by Binay Kumar, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India. The firm handles matters before the Supreme Court, High Courts across India, and District Courts in Delhi and NCR.
Hearing or deadline approaching?
Call the office and mention the date first. Do not wait for an online reply where time is running out.
What do you need help with?
Choose the issue closest to yours. You do not need to know the legal term.
Share a brief enquiry first. Send confidential documents only after the office confirms a suitable method.
Clear next steps, before you decide
Preparing for a first consultation
Prepare a short chronology, the latest order or notice, the names of the parties and your main questions. Ask about the proposed scope, fees and next steps before confirming instructions. Understand the enquiry process →Living outside India
Mention your country, time zone, the location of the dispute and any Indian proceedings. Ask whether a remote consultation is available and how documents can be shared securely. Do not assume that travel or a court appearance can be avoided. Family matters involving life abroad · Property and inheritance in India Arrange an initial enquiry →Leadership & Team
Meet the firm →
Managing Partner
Binay Kumar
Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India Mediator trained by the Mediation and Conciliation Project Committee (MCPC), Supreme Court of India
Practice groups led by Binay Kumar, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India.
Leadership & Team →
Contact the office →
Free legal aid and initial document review
Applying for legal aid in Delhi
Find out who may be eligible, what to prepare and how to apply through official legal services authorities. Read the free legal aid guide →Our independent pro bono team
People in financial need may request a free initial document review. The firm must confirm acceptance and scope; court representation is not automatically included. Read the scope and request a review →Principal capabilities
Explore all practice areas →Disputes
Dispute Resolution & Litigation
View practice →Appellate
Supreme Court Practice
View practice →Transactions
Corporate & Commercial Law
View practice →Public & Regulatory
Public Policy, Human Rights & Social Impact
View practice →Family & Private Client
Family and Matrimonial Disputes
View practice →Finance & Restructuring
Banking, Finance & Insolvency
View practice →Representative Supreme Court matters
Explore selected constitutional and larger-Bench proceedings in which Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record. The library distinguishes historical decisions, references and connected proceedings. View the matter library →Latest legal developments
Read Supreme Court updates →Legal analysis · Published
RTI and Co-operative Bank Records: Supreme Court Clarifies Members’ Access
A co-operative bank’s member may obtain specific records through the Registrar’s statutory access powers; the Supreme Court explains why this is not blanket public access.
Read the article →Legal analysis · Published
Fraudulent Land Acquisition and Public Purpose: Supreme Court in N. Arasappa
The Supreme Court examines prior approval of co-operative housing schemes, fraud in acquisition, and why delay and earlier litigation did not defeat relief on these facts.
Read the article →Legal analysis · Published
Atibir Industries–SBI Assigned Debt Dispute: Supreme Court Orders Additional Payment
The Supreme Court directs a further ₹125 crore payment to resolve a debt-assignment dispute, expressly leaving broader NPA and assignment issues open.
Read the article →Legal analysis · Published
Electricity Theft Assessments and Reconnection: Supreme Court Clarifies the Remedies
A distinction between provisional assessment for restoration, statutory appeal, and final civil liability in electricity-theft proceedings.
Read the article →Legal analysis · Published
Waqf Property, Gazette Records and Injunctions: Supreme Court Restores Relief
The Supreme Court considers the evidentiary significance of survey and Gazette material in a property dispute and restores an injunction.
Read the article →Legal analysis · Published
Third-Party Property Rights in Execution: Supreme Court Explains Order XXI CPC
A person not joined in the original suit can seek adjudication of rights during execution under Order XXI Rules 97–101; tax receipts do not establish ownership.
Read the article →Legal analysis · Published
Approved IBC Resolution Plans: Creditors Cannot Simply Change Their Minds
The Supreme Court explains the binding effect of CoC approval and the NCLT’s role when a debtor’s finances improve while the resolution plan awaits confirmation.
Read the article →Legal analysis · Published
Supreme Court Awards ₹6 Lakh After Six Years of Undertrial Custody: Arun @ Deepak
A six-year undertrial detention, failed proof of electronic and forensic evidence, and the Supreme Court’s exceptional direction for State compensation.
Read the article →Legal analysis · Published 22 October 2026
Can a WhatsApp Message Prove Murder? What the Supreme Court Actually Held
Can WhatsApp messages prove murder? The Supreme Court’s 2026 ruling explains electronic evidence, witness testimony and reasonable doubt. Kusumlal Sao v. State of Chhattisgarh · 2026 INSC 1148 · Judgment dated 13 October 2026 Read the article →Judgment · 16 October 2026 · 2026 INSC 1136
Supreme Court on Disciplinary Proceedings: Findings Based on “No Evidence” Remain Open to Judicial Review
The Supreme Court has clarified that disciplinary findings unsupported by evidence remain reviewable under Article 226, while also explaining the proper limits of interference by a Letters Patent Bench. Read the legal analysis →Judgment · 15 October 2026 · 2026 INSC 1135
Supreme Court: A Broad No-Interest Clause Can Bar Pre-Reference and Pendente Lite Interest in Arbitration
The Supreme Court has held that a sufficiently broad contractual no-interest clause can bar both pre-reference and pendente lite interest under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration Act. Read the legal analysis →Judgment · 15 October 2026 · 2026 INSC 1134
Supreme Court Clarifies Proof of Default Under Section 7 IBC — and Flags AI-Generated Non-Existent Judgments
The Supreme Court has clarified that an authenticated Information Utility Record of Default carries high evidentiary value in Section 7 IBC proceedings and that admission does not require a forensic reconciliation of accounts. Read the legal analysis →Latest insights
View all insights →Article · Criminal Law · 22 October 2026
Can a WhatsApp Message Prove Murder? What the Supreme Court Actually Held
Electronic evidence, witness testimony and reasonable doubt in the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kusumlal Sao. Read article →Case Note · Tax & Property
Stamp duty: valuation or fraudulent intent?
Read case note →Case Note · Commercial & IP
Trade mark suits and the Commercial Court forum
Read case note →Article · Disputes
Drafting dispute-resolution clauses that work
Read article →Practice Note · Litigation
Preparing for commercial litigation
Read note →Article · Family
Family disputes: litigation and mediation pathways
Read article →Practice Note · IP