The Justice Law PartnersAssessment and strategy
The initial record, legal questions, procedural stage and relief sought inform the proposed scope and approach.
Leadership & Practice Teams
Focused teams. Clear responsibility.
The Justice Law Partners deploys matter-specific teams for disputes, transactions and advisory work, with strategy and accountability anchored at senior level.
Leadership & Team
Led by Binay Kumar
Binay Kumar
Managing Partner · Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India
He leads the firm’s practice teams and remains responsible for strategic direction, advocacy standards and client accountability across accepted engagements.
How our teams work
Capability organised around the matter
Each practice team is led by Binay Kumar and supported by advocates and professionals selected according to the forum, subject matter and demands of the engagement. Individual team-member names are not published as a standing roster in order to respect client confidentiality, professional privacy, matter sensitivity and the need for flexible staffing. For every accepted engagement, the firm identifies the lawyers responsible directly to the client—providing clear accountability without unnecessarily exposing personnel or case associations.
Team 01
Dispute Resolution & Litigation
Commercial, civil and complex proceedings across courts, tribunals and arbitral forums.
View practice →Team 02
Supreme Court Practice
Appeals, special leave petitions, writs and strategic Supreme Court representation.
View practice →Team 03
Corporate & Commercial
Business contracts, governance, transactions and commercial risk advisory.
View practice →Team 04
Intellectual Property
Protection, enforcement and commercialisation of brands and creative assets.
View practice →Team 05
Taxation & Regulatory
Tax disputes and regulatory strategy with a litigation-aware approach.
View practice →Team 06
Banking, Finance & Insolvency
Financing, recovery, restructuring and insolvency-related representation.
View practice →Team 07
Real Estate & Infrastructure
Property, construction, project and infrastructure disputes and advisory.
View practice →Team 08
Family & Private Client
Family, matrimonial, succession and sensitive private-client disputes.
View practice →Team 09
Labour & Employment
Workplace advisory, employment documentation and contentious matters.
View practice →Team 10
Technology, Media & Data
Technology contracts, platform issues, media and data-protection advisory.
View practice →Team 11
Public Policy & Social Impact
Public-law, governance, human-rights and social-impact mandates.
View practice →Clear responsibility for an accepted matter
Practice teams are led by Binay Kumar. At the start of an accepted engagement, the scope of work and the lawyers responsible for the matter are identified directly to the client.
Preparation and representation
Drafting, filing and appearance arrangements should be clear in the engagement. Where additional or specialist counsel is proposed, their role and the associated arrangements are discussed with the client.
Communication
The responsible contact and document-sharing method are agreed so that deadlines, instructions and developments can be communicated clearly.
Advocate-on-Record
The Supreme Court Rules recognise an Advocate-on-Record as entitled to act as well as plead for a party before the Court. Read the official Rules.
Representative Supreme Court matters
Constitutional adjudication & larger-Bench proceedings
Binay Kumar’s Supreme Court practice includes representation of parties as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record in the matters listed below. The collection encompasses constitutional adjudication, statutory interpretation and proceedings associated with five- and seven-judge Benches, including larger-Bench references and connected matters.
Bench descriptions identify the relevant judgment, reference or connected proceeding. They do not imply that every matter is currently listed before that Bench or that the present engagement extended to an earlier judgment. Current listing status remains subject to verification before live publication.
Seven-judge Constitution Bench
Arjun Flour Mills v. State of Orissa
CA 8763/1994
Professional capacity: Counsel and Advocate-on-Record for an intervenor; written submissions filed through nodal counsel.
Seven-judge Constitution Bench
N. Ravi v. Speaker, Legislative Assembly, Chennai
WP(Crl) 206–210/2003
Professional capacity: Counsel and Advocate-on-Record for an intervenor; written submissions filed through nodal counsel.
Five-judge Constitution Bench reference
Santosh Associate v. HSIIDC
CA 10953/2026
Professional capacity: Counsel and Advocate-on-Record for an intervenor.
Five-judge decision; Money Bill issue referred to seven judges
Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank
CA 8588/2019
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge decision; Nabam Rebia issue referred to seven judges
Subhash Desai v. Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra
WP(C) 493/2022
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
Pyare Lal v. State of Haryana
CrA 1003/2017
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
Sameena Begum v. Union of India
WP(C) 222/2018
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
In Re: Mitigating Circumstances in Death Sentencing
SMW(Crl) 1/2022
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
In Re: Article 334 of the Constitution
WP(C) 546/2000
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
Karmanya Singh Sareen v. Union of India
SLP(C) 804/2017
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
Union of India v. Preeti Aggarwal
CrA 375/2006
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Seven-judge decision / connected proceedings
Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen
CA 37/1992
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
State of A.P. v. B. Archana Reddy
CA 7513/2005
Supreme Court record of proceedings — 12 February 2020: confirms the case identifier and the five-judge sitting on that date. This historical record does not establish current listing status or participation in that sitting.
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
State of Punjab v. Sahil Mittal
SLP(C) 3660/2008
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
State of West Bengal v. Paschim Banga B.K. Samity
CA 16879/1996
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Tagged with seven-judge Money Bill reference in Rojer Mathew
Thomas Franco Rajendra Dev v. Union of India
WP(C) 366/2022
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
Five-judge matter
Tej Bhan v. Ram Kishan
CA 6557/2022
Professional capacity: Binay Kumar represents a party as Counsel and Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India.
These entries are factual practice records, not outcome claims or assurances of results. No confidential instructions, client documents or personal identification records are included.